Silvered Dreams

the green-eyed monster November 2, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — sildaria @ 8:05 pm
Tags:

The Dangerous Passion

by David M. Buss

 

Jealousy is ‘a state that is aroused by a perceived threat to a valued relationship or position and motivates behaviour aimed at countering the threat.’

- it is a state, transient

- it is response to a threat to a valued relationship in which a person is heavily invested in. you don’t get jealous about people you don’t care about, nor get jealous because of someone who you don’t think is a threat

- it motivates action designed to deal with the threat

 

Jealousy is not envy

Envy implies covetousness, malice and ill-will directed at someone who has what you lack; jealousy implies the fear of losing to a rival a valuable partner you already have.

 

Jealousy has adaptive function: designed to deal with real threats to relationships.

 

Both genders get jealous and both forms of infidelity are extremely upsetting. however, men tend to be more jealous about sexual infidelity and women emotional infidelity. From evolutionary point of view, this is because men can never be sure of the paternity of the children while women need to secure the emotional fidelity of men, in order to ensure that he will continue to provide the resources needed for her and the child.

 

Jealousy evolved as primary defense, a co-evolved response to threats of a partner’s infidelity and abandonment. It becomes activated whenever a person perceives signs of defection – a strange scent, a sudden change in sexual behaviour, a suspicious absence.

 

The intensity of jealousy also reveals to the partner information about the strength of commitment. people correctly interpret the total absence of jealousy as failure to be sufficiently committed to the relationship.

 

women have developed a strategy of deliberately evoking jealousy by strategically flirting with other men in their partner’s presence.

- increase the man’s perception of their desirability. remind them that she is still desirable

- provides a litmus test: by gauging partner’s response, she can evaluate the strength of his commitment

- increases a man’s commitment: by convincing him that he is surrounded by rivals, the man strengthens his commitment to her

though co-evolution also means that men have learnt to distinguish real threats from false alarms, to separate casual flirtation from real sexual interest.

 

Error Management Theory

evolution by selection will favour the inference that leads to the less costly error in order to avoid the more costly error. – false accusation of infidelity

 

Conditions that predict jealousy

- erectile dysfunction and male menopause

- alcohol intoxication

- women’s sexual dissatisfaction

- differences in desirability

 

susceptibility to infidelity: differences in attractiveness

those who perceive themselves as higher in mate value more likely to express desire for extramarital affairs and more likely to act on these desires. those who are well-matched with partners are the least likely to desire or engage in affairs.

 

gender difference in mate value: men are more threatened by other men who have better resources (more financially well-off), women are more threatened by other women who look more attractive (younger, prettier)

 

why women have affairs

- scent of symmetry: phermones, prefer more symmetrical men as affair partners

- sexy sons theory

- mate insurance

- trading up

- better sexual satisfaction

 

Love is a passion that defies rationality. It tells you that your partner has only eyes for you and won’t leave you because the odds are that sooner or later your partner will meet someone who is a bit better than you on mate value and also wants your partner as much as you do. We know a partner’s love through actions but the actions must reveal underlying emotions that defy rationality. one of these emotions is jealousy.

Jealousy is one of the most commonly found correlates of being in love. it evolved to protect love from not merely the threat of loss but from the threat of loss to a rival.

 

social contagion September 16, 2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — sildaria @ 11:06 pm
Tags:

This NYtimes article is fascinating (well, at least fascinating to a very pro-social-psychology person like me ^_^)

 

The article mentions the Tipping Point as well which i coincidentally just finished reading (i rushed it so that i can return the lib book tmr)

The Tipping Point – Malcolm Gladwell

 

basically he proposes the idea of a social epidemic.. where something small suddenly gains momentum and spreads rapidly

and there are 3 main ingredients to this:

"law of the few"
- people who are well-connected "connectors"; ppl who are info-oriented/experts "mavens" and ppl who are highly persuasive "salesmen" -  these are the people who spread the idea/contagion

 

Contagiousness – a function of the messenger
Stickiness – property of the message

 

the stickiness factor - is how well that idea/action stick/ how memorable it is
- sesame street, blue’s clues

 

power of context
- broken window theory
- an epidemic can be tipped by tinkering with the smallest details of the immediate environment
- group of max 150 ideal – close personal community, peer pressure to achieve – "transactive memory"

 

smoking
- smoking "type" – Eysenck’s extrovert; greater sex drive; more "anti-social" (misconduct, rebellious, defiant); impulsive, risk-taking; lack of deference
- Smokers are cool – the select few that drive the epidemic – "Law of the Few"
- Stickiness factor: nicotine
- how likely a person smokes dependent on how much overall pleasure he gets from his first experience with smoking/nicotine
- "chippers" ppl who smoke up to 5 a day but at least 4 days a week – aka not truly addicted; equivalent to social drinkers
- difference between chippers and hardcore smokers – possible genetic
- ppl who never smoke again: bodies extremely sensitive to nicotine, incapable of handling it in smallest amounts: bad first experience
- chippers: ppl who derive pleasure from smoking but not able to handle large doses
- heavy smokers: ppl who derive pleasure and can handle large doses
- unlikely to tackle the contagion: adults don’t approve of smoking – of course teenagers want to do it; this leave the stickiness

- nicotine patch not very effective cos it doesn’t deliver the same hit as smoking (gradual vs buzz)
- 1st Tipping point: correlation between depression and smoking: drug used to treat depression, bupropion – lifts mood in the same way that smoking does – increase dopamine and norepinephrine
- 2nd Tipping point: nicotine addiction is gradual and non-linear – nicotine threshold: 5 cigarettes a day- 5mg
- reduce nicotine levels such that even the heaviest smokers (30 a day) cannot get beyond the threshold in a day
- allow for teenage experimentation but the habit will not longer be sticky

 

Getting Things Done May 13, 2007

Filed under: Uncategorized — sildaria @ 3:23 pm
Tags:

Reading Getting Things Done. It’s a good book on (as it’s named) getting things done; a book on productivity.

Here’s a primer to what the book is all about. Black Belt Productivity >> GTD Primer

Few things I realised after reading this book.

  • I have no system of organising my paper stuff.
  • I have lots of random thoughts that go through my mind all the time.
  • writing down whatever that comes to mind before I sleep helps to solve my insomnia problem.

Related links:

The Simple Dollar >> Review: Getting Things Done